It is important to compare wearing the Ray-Ban metas with regular glasses as an all day glasses wearer. While they do look like regular Wayfarer sunglasses they sit larger and bulkier than the “New Wayfarer” style that I have been used to wearing. When I switch back to my everyday Warby Parker glasses I find my face feeling a little bit of relief, even if I do not notice the weight while I’m wearing the Meta glasses. The prescription lens quality is optically fantastic as ordered direct from the Ray-Ban website. I do not think these are perfect as your only glasses but I find myself happy wearing them a lot more than I expected.
A big question with the cost of the frame being so high is whether it’s worth investing in Transitions lenses, or buying one or two pairs with clear and/or tinted lenses. I tried Transitions for the first time with these and have come away impressed. The latest generation changes tint quickly and in bright sunlight is sufficiently dark that I do not miss regular sunglasses. The only downside is the tint barely activates in cars due to their UV shielded glass. Allegedly the Xtractive line resolves this issue at the cost of maintaining a slight tint indoors, a trade off I did not want to make. The regular Transitions stay perfectly clear inside. I am happy with my choice here.
The camera is not amazing but it is good enough. Photos are usually clear at close and medium range, and Meta will smart crop them to account for the angle your head is at to make them look normal. Videos are a bit better than the photos. Even when you shake your head the stabilization of the video (presumably software based) is decent. Being able to quickly get first person perspective photos means you do not miss shots you might otherwise not take.
Meta AI is ironically the thing I find myself using the least. While the conversational aspect feels significantly more natural than speaking with Siri, Meta AI suffers from being disconnected. It cannot search the web for answers. There are no connections to have it interact with my smart home devices via HomeKit. It has a reminders system that is separate from the Apple app. The future will not arrive until Meta and Apple build bridges instead of walls between their ecosystems.
The stand out feature is the shockingly clear speakers. While audio is not as detailed as my AirPods Pro, it is more than sufficient for phone calls, gaming, and podcasts, and passable for casual music listening. It has been an incredible convenience to not have to take my AirPods Pro in and out of my ears while wearing these. While transparency mode for AirPods is nice, I feel less isolated from the world without AirPods in my ears. Less need to fumble with the AirPods means I find myself listening to podcasts in situations that I would normally go without. There is some sound leakage to the outside world, but its not noticeable at lower volume levels.
The achilles heel is the half-day battery life. If you leave the house for an extended period of time you will have to bring your charging case if you plan to use the smart features later in the day. You can continue using these as regular eyeglasses once the batteries die, but it defeats the point. Most people will not be satisfied with these as their only pair of eyeglasses. IPX4 water resistance means you should leave them home when riding water rides or swimming at the pool.
A few weeks with these has shown me that smart glasses will be a part of our future. Google recently announced a line of their smart glasses and Apple is allegedly developing their own pair due to be released in 2026. As better battery and further miniaturization of electronics arrives, more exciting frame options should follow. If you are an early adopter you will enjoy the Ray-Ban Meta AI Glasses today, but we are a few years out from this product category truly maturing.
]]>This is feedback I got from an employee at a place I used to work when they left. The culture at this place was incredibly progressive. Filled with wonderful well meaning folks trying to marry their careers to their purpose. This person’s heart matched the mission of where they were, but the culture kept them from feeling included. A place where failing to master new lingo could be a micro-aggression and disagreeing with others could be a crises. In the 80s progressivism was punk rock — raw, accessible, and focused on empowering ordinary people. In 2024 it has become avant-garde jazz — technically sophisticated but focused on complex terminology and impressing insiders.
While progressives can stand to be kinder in their culture they can also stand to be more machiavellian in their politics. Bad faith claims around Obama’s birth, Kamala Harris’ race, and the integrity of elections proliferated against Democratic candidates. Our failure to master information warfare is knee-capped by an allergy to hyperbole. Meanwhile when holding power in Congress Democrats have been too trigger shy to eliminate the filibuster. We could not get our heads out of asses to expand the Supreme Court after Merrick Garland was denied a seat. We need a gentler heart in our community and a sharper edge in our tactics.
If Democrats want to fight they need to learn to land punches as well as they take them. Republican rhetoric manages to knock down Democrats while raising themselves up: “liberal crybaby” implies the target is dramatic and the critic is levelheaded. When progressives lob criticisms weird is a soft jab where stupid would be a strong blow. Trump has shown us the electorate does not see this kind of language as mean, but as authentic. We would be remiss to ignore this lesson.
The key is to punch up, not punch down. Instead of unleashing our sharpest knives on our family or neighbors we should save them for the politicians and billionaires that tell us our enemies are down the street instead of up in the penthouse. Save your patience for your colleague trying to navigate a changing world and save your fire for the con men that profit off of the fears and struggles of working Americans.
Democrats and progressives also came off in the past year as caring more about the Middle East than Middle America. Voters have limited time and attention. As heartbreaking as the situation in Gaza is, most folks do not see it as pressing as the issues here at home.1 Wasting oxygen on issues that divide us inevitably hurts our efforts, especially when we can unite behind causes that matter like ending hunger and homelessness.
The path forward requires both humility and boldness. Progressives must rebuild a movement that speaks to ordinary Americans in plain language about the issues that affect their daily lives. This means creating spaces where people can engage without fear of missteps, while still advancing justice and equality. It also means fighting harder and smarter, using the full range of political tools available to us when we are in power.
]]>Hardware security keys are small devices that plug into a computer or smart phone and provide a strong physical form of two-factor authentication. This technology is proven, and widely supported by Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Unlike software based solutions they are virtually impervious to phishing attacks and remote hacking attempts. Yet despite their effectiveness companies resist using them due to perceived inconvenience or cost.
The Massachusetts Attorney General’s office should begin investigating companies in critical sectors like healthcare and finance and inventory whether they use hardware security keys. Some gentle prodding might be sufficient to spur action by some, but others may require a more direct approach. Using their authority under 93A the Attorney General’s office should make clear that failing to secure sensitive data and systems with hardware security keys are an unfair or deceptive trade practice.
Next session the Massachusetts legislature should take this further by codifying the requirement that critical systems be protected with hardware security keys. The Commonwealth can lead by example with rules for its own systems, along with future software procurements. Extra penalties and enhanced damage awards should be codified for breaches that could have been prevented by hardware security keys but were not. These penalties should escalate annually so they grow from a nudge to a bludgeon over three years. Let us pass an audacious bill that puts hackers and scammers on notice that their era of easy money is over.
When seatbelts were first introduced, many viewed them as unnecessary. When airbags came along, they argued they were too costly. Today we cannot imagine driving a car without these life saving innovations. The free market is great at a lot of things, but mandating its own conscience is not one of them. It is past time for our state government to bridge the gap between the private sector’s innovation and its adoption of security technology.
]]>Understanding the methods and considerations that go into designing a well built home gives you insight into issues you might not have been able to previously articulate or see in your own home. As someone who bought a condo it also is nice to have a sense of what a forever home might have or look like compared to what is available on the market. Finally the fact that so few of these ideas in the book match what is happening with renovations around my neighborhood makes me question how much thought the local builders have put into these issues.
One thing that stood is out is the authors of the book hate plastic products. Although better than it was, vinyl siding will never look as good as wood or fiber board to me. However I will disagree with them on the use of things like Trex, which uses recycled plastic and is less maintenance than a straight wood deck.
It seems odd that the security industry and its approach to protecting users and its data is not under scrutiny after the Crowdstrike incident. The no blame postmortem has wilted into a no accountability box checking exercise. The amount of security hoops to jump through seems to grow every year, but so do the number of breaches. We cannot keep paying more for failure.
Whole classes of security software duplicate functionality provided by other software or hook in to monitor it. If Windows and MacOS have built-in anti-malware tools, why does your browser also need that? Is Crowdstrike really going to be better at identifying threats than Microsoft? If you’re going to deploy restrictions on software users can install, what level of scrutiny is sufficient for approval? Did you read the source code? Did you read the source code for the dependent libraries? In a zero trust environment should a browser extension really be a threatening attack vector?
When corporations buy automobiles, they do not buy special versions that have different locks and immobilizers than what the general public buys. Yet for some reason folks think corporations need special versions of software to be secure. The fact that Google touts a secure version of Chrome implies that the regular version is not secure. Yet there is no special reason they could not simply integrate the secure settings and features into their main version.
]]>Galloway’s sobering advice comes off as a bit contrarian to the kinds of things you might hear in a college graduation speech. Where folks might advise “follow your passion” Galloway makes a case for trying to accumulate the wealth you need to live the life you want to live. If starving artist does not suit you, Galloway’s advice might resonate.
When I was younger my father kept telling me to put money into an IRA. Even when I was not making much and found it to be a stretch. Dad knew, just as Galloway points out, that it’s good to get into the habit of saving. Combined with the magic of compound interest, you have a foundation for a financially secure future.
Galloway spends some detours ruminating on his decision to buy and maintain a private jet. This isn’t a normal person problem, but through it he explains that it is worth buying your time back. You can always make more money, but everyone gets the same 24 hours in the day. Do not waste it sitting in lines if you do not have to.
]]>If you want to do some one off convenience scripting on iPadOS Apple Shortcuts bridges the gap between the more simple operating system and some of the advanced things software engineers would want to do. Shortcuts gives you a way to automate the boring stuff.
Sometimes your defenses fail. Or in this case you fall victim to friendly fire. The faster you can recover from failure the less painful it is.
When natural disaster strikes in the United States, FEMA comes in and helps manage the situation. When a major technical incident occurs we need to a government agency that can swoop in and help. By establishing a Digital Services Reserve we can have experts at the ready to do things like manually update lots of computers or dissect otherwise inscrutable technical problems. If government can provide a surge of help, hospitals, banks, and other critical organizations will more quickly be able to recover.
]]>When I experienced projects like this working in government I realized they are Christmas trees. An idea arrives with an over-sized budget so mid-level managers see the opportunity to decorate them with their own ideas, dreams, and aspirations. The simple idea or directive from the top becomes lost. The project morphs into a death march as scope explodes and number of objectives becomes insurmountable. The lesson we learned from healthcare.gov is the only way to tame this kind of beast is a directive from the top with people smart enough to see the whole system that are empowered to make hard choices.
]]>Security is treated as a compliance function and as a result rules are made and audited by non-technical experts. While they may develop expertise in their rules and general concepts, they do not have a full understanding of the systems they are securing and how the security mechanisms work. Additionally it is tough to argue against frivolous measures and poor implementations when the other side can frame you as being against security. This is rarely a good place to be.