Putting the Scanner Companies Out of Business

I was looking at buying a scanner like a Fujitsu ScanSnap. They come highly rated and my thought was that it might tame the large amount of paper accumulating on my desk. However I recently became aware of scanner applications for the iPhone and decided to test a couple. The first one I tried was JotNot. It worked decently but if there were too many folds or a document was crinkled then the text would get too light in parts. This made some of the scans unusable. After doing some research I saw people recommended TurboScan and so I gave that shot.

I must say that this is the new must have application for iPhone. It takes the pictures quickly (or has an option you can take three photos to maximize that sharpness of the scan) and then you have several post processing options to lighten or darken it, rotate it, and set the boundaries. In my experience TurboScan worked much better than JotNot with a crinkled receipt. For only $1.99 you turn your iPhone into a scanner and can e-mail the PDF of the document to any address from the phone or save it to the iPhone camera roll or print if you have an AirPrint enabled printer. If you have a large number of documents a copier might be better but this app is good in a pinch and certainly saved me a $300 purchase.

New Use for my iPhone: Depositing Checks

I’ve been a customer of ING Direct for a while. So I was really excited to discover that not only do they have an iPhone app but the app lets you deposit checks using the phone’s camera. It’s pretty simple, you just take a picture of the front and the back of the check using the application and it uploads them to the bank. You wait two days and then the money is in your account. Friends had told me about this service with their bank which made me jealous, now I can say that I too have joined the 21st century. My only complaint is that the phone does not yet print cash.

Connecticut Forum: Our Fragile Earth

Connecticut Forum Stage

I just got back from the Connecticut Forum on Our Fragile Earth. The panel was a great: Dan Esty, Michael Pollan, and Majora Carter. John Dankosky did a fantastic job as moderator. All three of the panelists were pro-environment and as a result I think that the discussion lost a little bit of flavor it could have had if someone was there advocating for the interests of business. I’m sure it could not have been difficult to find a construction worker or factory owner that was overburdened by environmental regulation. Though as Mr. Esty noted, many times there are places where the interests of business and the environment align and that’s the best and easiest way to create positive environmental change. 

The one large point of contention had to do with the issue of hydrofracking. Mr. Esty noted that New York was moving to regulate it and that hydrofracking could be fairly safe if done properly. Ms. Carter felt that leaving regulation to local governments would cause poorer areas to disproportionately host hydrofracking. While Ms. Carter’s concerns are real, I think she failed to consider that the people in these areas still have choices and can regulate hydrofracking in the same manner as the wealthy areas. Mr. Esty also raised the idea that the risk of polluted water in some areas might be worth the benefit of cleaner air that would result from the switchover to natural gas from coal. I was surprised to learn that Connecticut is a big pollution importer. Mr. Esty noted that with the pollution coming in from New Jersey and New York we already exceed emission standards without contributing our own.

When it came to tackling the policy issues the panel identified corporate contributions and influence as a major barrier to implementing effective policy. One panelist noted that it was the large agricultural firms receiving the best subsidies. I think that as a state we are still hurting from the Rowland era and Citizens’ United still sits in the back of our minds. I wonder if the cheers would have been as loud had the audience been from New York or New Jersey. If so, it is surprising that there is not an appetite in the United States Congress to tackle that issue.

Mr. Pollan focused on the issue of food. He laid out the principle that you should eat food with few ingredients and never eat anything your grandmother would not recognize. There was also some discussion of food deserts and agriculture policy. It was not clear to me how these tangents on food topics tied in to the environment until Mr. Pollan described some kind of enclosed greenhouse system where food was grown and fish swam. This greenhouse was warmed by compost and was designed to be a sustainable self-contained system. Though maybe the point of the food discussion circled back to the beginning where Mr. Dankosky noted that the Earth itself is not that fragile, but we are the fragile ones, and so it is important that we think about caring for ourselves as much as we think about caring for the Earth.

Overall the three-hour discussion generated many interesting ideas. At the end the panelists suggested if we want to do something then we should read more about the topic (I will add the book recommendations when I find them later), change something in our community, and change something in our own lives. By doing that we can take some small steps to protecting our fragile Earth.

Video of Simon Johnson at Connecticut Journal of International Law Financing Sovereignty Symposium

Someone came to this blog searching for the video from our symposium. Since I try and provide full service to my readers the link is here. You will have to skip towards the end to find Simon Johnson’s speech. If you missed the event and have a lot of free time you might also want to watch the full thing.

The Student Loan Rate Fight

Recently the Obama campaign and Democrats have been pushing the issue of student loan rates front and center. The issue is that if Congress does not act then the low interest on student loans will double to 6.8%. This is the same rate currently paid by graduate and law students like me. The difference in the interest rate is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of student loans many people have, and it is also important to note that in the last budget deal that subsidized loans for graduate students were eliminated. Meanwhile the tuition rates at colleges keep going up. Here in Connecticut UConn President Susan Herbst pledged to raise tuition 5% to 6% a year.

In the video above Obama seemed clear that as long as schools raised tuition their federal aid would go down. Yet it is not clear that anything has come of this pledge. In spite of all the rhetoric it seems that higher education exists in a bubble. The demand for seats at most schools remains strong, so there is little incentive for them to lower tuition. Unless the federal government takes the lead in fighting the rising cost of tuition, schools will continue to raise their prices and students will pay for them with easy credit. It’s sad to say that there is little boldness in this student loan rate fight. We need our leaders to do more to rein in the cost of higher education before the bubble pops.

Follow Zagaja.com posts: RSS Feed
This work by Matt Zagaja is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.